
For short-term rental operators
See what your tool stack actually costs, where it overlaps, and what one connected platform replaces.
The stack calculator is an interactive, wide comparison — it's built for a larger screen. Open this page on a desktop or tablet to compare your tools and see what Recal replaces.
See Recal pricing →There are two ways the bill goes wrong. The small operator's tools are mostly free — Google Sheets, WhatsApp, a calendar, a Notion page — so the cost isn't money, it's the faff: re-typing the same booking into five places, a calendar that updates on its own schedule, nothing that knows about anything else. The professional manager's bill is the opposite — per-seat task tools, a channel manager, dynamic pricing, owner reporting, and the automation tax of stitching it all together. That's where $300–1,000+ a month hides.
What a connected platform replaces. Recal does the operations layer natively: a unified multi-property calendar, bookings, tasks and turnovers, checklists and SOPs, notes, files, contacts, a damage log, owner reporting, a financial Stats dashboard, internal team messaging and a customisable dashboard — all connected to the property they belong to, visible to the people who need them.
What you keep. Recal is not a channel manager, a dynamic pricing engine or a smart lock platform. Those are specialist jobs, and you keep them. The honest version of this comparison is the useful one: Recal is the connected core, and your specialists plug in around it.
It varies enormously by scale. A self-managing owner often runs five to ten mostly-free tools — the cost is time, not money. A professional manager with a team and a channel manager typically spends $300–1,000+ a month once per-seat and per-listing tools are added up. The calculator on this page estimates your own stack from public list prices.
No. Recal is a property management platform, not a channel manager — there's no two-way API integration, no rate sync, and it doesn't push your availability back out to the OTAs in real time. What it does do on the calendar is import your Airbnb, Vrbo and Booking.com feeds via iCal, with a genuinely transparent sync-management system: you see exactly what's synced, from where, when it last ran, what overlaps and what didn't import — clearer than most iCal platforms — plus built-in conflict detection that flags double-bookings arriving through the feeds. If you need true channel management you keep one and run operations in Recal; plenty of operators don't.
No — it depends entirely on how you work. If you take bookings across several listing sites, you'll likely keep a channel manager to sync availability and rates, and run the operations in Recal alongside it. But plenty of operators run on Recal alone: agencies working on referrals and direct enquiries, managers looking after an owner's private homes, or staff teams running a single family's properties — where there's no third-party distribution to manage at all. Recal is a property management platform first; a channel manager only matters if multi-channel distribution is part of your model.
Two layers: your operations and your general productivity stack. That's the calendar, bookings tracker, task and turnover tools, checklists and SOPs, notes, file storage, contacts, owner reporting, a revenue/occupancy Stats dashboard, internal team messaging and your dashboard — the things that today live across five to ten disconnected apps like Sheets, Notion, Trello, WhatsApp and Drive. Recal does them natively, connected, and property-aware.
No — those are specialist jobs you keep alongside Recal. The calculator is explicit about it: dynamic pricing (PriceLabs, Beyond), guest messaging automation (often bundled into your channel manager), and smart locks are kept as add-ons. A comparison where one tool wins everything isn't honest.
Replace the cobbled operations stack — and keep the specialists you actually need.